Five Reasons Calvinism is Wrong

Calvinism has long exerted theological influence over many branches of the Church, offering a systematic framework known by the acronym TULIP—Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints. While the system seeks to uphold the sovereignty of God and the seriousness of sin, its rigid formulations often depart from the plain teaching of Scripture and, in doing so, distort key doctrines of salvation. Each point in the Calvinist construct contains embedded assumptions that collapse vital biblical distinctions—between depravity and inability, between God’s love and arbitrary election, between provision and application, and between faith and performance. This article aims to examine each of the five points, not out of theological sport, but out of a pastoral concern for the clarity of the gospel, the character of God, and the assurance of every believer. The truth of God’s Word is not merely to be systematized but rightly divided—and when Calvinism’s claims are laid alongside Scripture, it is evident that its conclusions must be graciously but firmly rejected.

One key reason for rejecting Calvinism is its overstated doctrine of Total Depravity, often redefined as Total Inability. While Scripture affirms that all humanity is born in sin and spiritually dead (Rom 3:10-18; Eph 2:1-3), it does not teach that the unregenerate are incapable of believing the gospel unless they are first regenerated. Calvinism reverses the biblical order by making regeneration the cause of faith rather than its result. Yet Scripture consistently places faith prior to regeneration (John 1:12-13; Gal 3:2; Eph 1:13). Depravity means people cannot save themselves, but it does not mean they are unable to respond to God’s gracious initiative. The Holy Spirit convicts the world—not just the elect—of sin, righteousness, and judgment (John 16:8), and the invitation to salvation is extended to all (John 3:16; Acts 17:30; 1 Tim 2:4; 2 Pet 3:9). If humans were truly incapable of responding, divine judgment would be unjust (John 3:18). Fallen man retains the God-given capacity to believe the truth, even in his sinful state.

A second reason Calvinism must be rejected is its doctrine of Unconditional Election, which teaches that God chooses some individuals for salvation apart from any foreseen faith or response. This view portrays God as arbitrary, undermining both His justice and love. Scripture testifies repeatedly that God desires all to be saved (1 Tim 2:4; 2 Pet 3:9) and that Christ died for all (1 John 2:2; Heb 2:9). Election, properly understood, is corporate and positional—centered in Christ (Eph 1:4). Individuals are elect in Him, not elected to be placed into Him. God’s foreknowledge includes His omniscient awareness of those who would freely believe the gospel (Rom 8:29; 1 Pet 1:1-2). The Calvinistic view makes divine election mechanical and void of relational engagement. It ignores the clear biblical teaching that God’s call is sincere and that He honors faith wherever it is found (Acts 10:34-35). The universal offer of salvation is genuine, not a theological formality masking an exclusive decree.

The third objection concerns the doctrine of Limited Atonement, which asserts that Christ died only for the elect and not for the whole world. This is a direct contradiction of numerous biblical passages. Scripture plainly teaches that Jesus is “the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), that He “tasted death for everyone” (Heb 2:9), and that He is “the propitiation… not for our sins only, but also for those of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). The atonement is sufficient for all and applied only to those who believe. Calvinism’s limitation of the cross reduces the scope of divine love and restricts the sincerity of God’s universal invitation. In contrast, the New Testament repeatedly affirms that salvation is available to whoever believes (John 3:16; Rom 10:13; Rev 22:17). Christ’s death is an actual provision they freely reject. Limiting the atonement turns the cross into an exclusive transaction, instead of the worldwide offer that Scripture declares it to be.

A fourth reason for rejecting Calvinism is its doctrine of Irresistible Grace. This teaching claims that when God intends to save someone, He will draw them to Himself in such a way that they cannot resist. But Scripture testifies that the grace of God can indeed be resisted. Stephen declared to the Sanhedrin, “You always resist the Holy Spirit” (Acts 7:51). Jesus lamented over Jerusalem’s rejection: “I wanted to gather your children… and you were unwilling” (Matt 23:37). Grace, though powerful and persuasive, does not override the will. God draws all people to Himself (John 12:32), and the Spirit convicts the world (John 16:8-11), but He does so in a way that honors human volition. Jesus rebuked the religious leaders of His day, saying, “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me; and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life” (John 5:39-40). Faith, by definition, must be freely exercised (John 5:40). If grace were truly irresistible, unbelief would not be blameworthy. Yet the Bible consistently holds people responsible for rejecting the truth (Rom 1:18-20). The love of God does not compel belief by force. Grace woos, invites, persuades—but never coerces.

The final point, Perseverance of the Saints, is also problematic because it confuses the free gift of salvation with the ongoing process of sanctification. According to this doctrine, all true believers will necessarily persevere in faith and good works, and those who fall away prove they were never saved. This view imports performance as a condition for assurance and undermines the certainty of eternal life. Scripture teaches that eternal life is given at the moment of faith (John 3:16; 5:24), that believers are justified by faith in Christ (Rom 3:28; 5:1), sealed by the Spirit (Eph 1:13), and kept by God’s power (1 Pet 1:5). While sanctification is God’s will for every believer (1 Th 4:3; 1 Pet 2:2), failure to persevere does not invalidate one’s justification. Believers can fall into carnality (1 Cor 3:1-3), suffer divine discipline (1 Cor 11:30-32; Heb 12:6), or lose eternal rewards (1 Cor 3:12-15; 2 John 1:8), but they cannot forfeit eternal life, which is a permanent possession (John 10:28; Rom 8:38-39). Calvinism’s view of perseverance entangles the believer in endless self-examination, undermining the peace that comes from knowing salvation rests not on endurance but on the finished work of Christ.

In sum, the five points of Calvinism—Total Depravity as inability, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints—stand in conflict with the clear teaching of Scripture. They distort God’s character, obscure the freeness of the gospel, and erode assurance. The biblical gospel proclaims that Christ died for all, that salvation is offered to all, that eternal life is received through faith alone, and that believers are eternally secure, called to grow in grace—not to prove they were saved, but because they are.

Steven R. Cook, D.Min., M.Div.

If this article has enriched your understanding and walk with Christ, and you feel led to support my ministry, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Your gifts enable me to continue sharing the gospel of grace and providing in-depth biblical teachings. Thank you for partnering with me in this mission.

Related Articles:

One thought on “Five Reasons Calvinism is Wrong

  1. Calvinism is a dangerous doctrine that has sorely impacted the healthy Church “ecosystem”. TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE! I pray that whoever reads this will share a copy of this article with it their friends, in love, or the sake of The Name that is above every other Name!

Leave a Reply