God promised to give the nation of Israel a specific territory as an everlasting possession. The Lord said to Abram, “For all the land which you see, I will give it to you and to your descendants forever” (Gen 13:15). This unconditional covenantal grant of land was reaffirmed to Isaac and Jacob (Gen 26:3; 28:13), encompassing a vast region “from the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates” (Gen 15:18). Historically, Israel has never possessed the full extent of this promised territory. However, many covenant theologians assert that God has already fulfilled His land promise to Israel, appealing to certain Old Testament passages as proof. They point, for example, to Joshua’s record: “So Joshua took the whole land, according to all that the Lord had spoken to Moses… Thus the land had rest from war” (Josh 11:23), and again, “the Lord gave Israel all the land which He had sworn to give to their fathers, and they possessed it and lived in it… Not one of the good promises which the Lord had made to the house of Israel failed; all came to pass” (Josh 21:43–45; cf. Josh 23:14). These verses are taken as evidence, by covenant theologians, that the Abrahamic land grant found its completion in the conquest under Joshua. Additionally, the statement that “Solomon ruled over all the kingdoms from the River to the land of the Philistines and to the border of Egypt” (1 Ki 4:21) is taken as evidence that Israel’s territory extended to the full Abrahamic boundaries (Gen 15:18). Even Nehemiah’s affirmation, “You… made a covenant with him to give the land… and You have fulfilled Your promise, for You are righteous” (Neh 9:7–8), is cited as confirmation that the divine land promise was fully realized.
However, though God fulfilled His promise in bringing Israel into the land, the narrative of Joshua makes it clear that large portions of territory remained unconquered. The Lord said to Joshua, “You are old and advanced in years, and very much of the land remains to be possessed” (Josh 13:1). Scripture further records that “the sons of Manasseh could not take possession of these cities” (Josh 17:12), that “they did not drive them out completely” (Josh 17:13), and that “they did not drive out the Canaanites who lived in Gezer” (Josh 16:10; cf. 15:63; 23:12–13). Following Joshua’s death, the book of Judges repeatedly affirms Israel’s incomplete obedience, stating that the tribes “did not drive out” the Canaanites from numerous regions (Judg 1:19, 21, 27–36). These repeated statements demonstrate that, while Israel possessed the land in principle under God’s covenant faithfulness, the full territorial boundaries promised to Abraham were not yet realized in practice. Fruchtenbaum notes, “Never in Old Testament history did Israel possess, dwell, and settle in all of the Promised Land. Nor did it ever happen in Jewish history since. However, the Palestinian Covenant guarantees that some day it will.”[1]
The conquest under Joshua and the later monarchy under Solomon cannot be regarded as the final fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant. Numerous prophecies anticipated Israel’s future inheritance of the land (Amos 9:14–15), and the nation never possessed the full extent of the territory promised to Abraham, which stretched eastward to the Euphrates (Gen 15:18). Israel’s occupation was neither permanent—since the Babylonian exile removed them from the land—nor complete, as Judges records that many Canaanite cities remained unconquered (Judg 1:27–34). The land described in Joshua 21 corresponded only to the Mosaic boundaries of Numbers 34, not the larger Abrahamic grant. Even in the New Testament era, Israel still awaited national restoration (Acts 1:6–8; Rom 11:25).
The book of Joshua, therefore, celebrates God’s covenant faithfulness in bringing His people into the land (Josh 21:43–45), yet it also acknowledges that their occupation was partial and temporary rather than ultimate and complete (Josh 13:1; 23:12–13). According to Phillips, “Not even during the great days of David and Solomon did Israel possess more than a tithe of the total land grant that is hers under the Abrahamic covenant.”[2] Geisler states that Israel “did not possess all the land that was promised to Abraham, namely, east of Jordan all the way to the Euphrates (Gen 15:18)… they did not possess it forever, as promised to Abraham, but were later dispossessed of it by the Babylonian captivity.”[3] Campbell adds, “This did not mean that every corner of the land was in Israel’s possession, for God Himself had told Israel they would conquer the land gradually (Deut 7:22).”[4] The conquest fulfilled God’s word to that generation, but not the full scope of the Abrahamic promise, which extends “from the river of Egypt as far as the great river, the river Euphrates” (Gen 15:18). Campbell further states, “Joshua 21:43 refers to the extent of the land as outlined in Numbers 34 and not to the ultimate extent as it will be in the messianic kingdom (Gen 15:18–21). Also, though Israel possessed the land at this time it was later dispossessed, whereas the Abrahamic Covenant promised Israel that she would possess the land forever (Gen 17:8).”[5]
Joshua 21:43 must be read in light of other passages of Scripture. It means that God fulfilled His word to that generation by granting the land they actually claimed in faith. The Lord had said, “Every place on which the sole of your foot treads, I have given it to you, just as I spoke to Moses” (Josh 1:3). God’s word to Joshua, therefore, was limited to the immediate context of conquest and distribution, not to the ultimate fulfillment of the covenant made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Regarding the remaining nations in the land, Joshua reminded Israel, “The Lord your God, He will thrust them out from before you and drive them from before you; and you will possess their land, just as the Lord your God promised you” (Josh 23:5). Yet even by the end of Joshua’s life, those nations still occupied significant portions of Canaan, a fact repeatedly acknowledged in the text (Josh 13:1–6; 23:12–13). Consequently, Joshua’s declaration that “the Lord gave Israel all the land” (21:43) should be understood through what scholars identify as representative universalism—a Hebrew idiom in which a part is spoken of as the whole. This linguistic feature is common in Scripture, where comprehensive terms convey theological completeness rather than exhaustive literal scope. Thomas Constable observes:
It was common among the Semites to regard a part of the whole as the whole (cf. Deut 26:5–10; 1 Kings 13:32; Jer 31:5; 2 Sam 5:6–10; Rev 14:1; 22:2; Rom 15:19–24). The name for this viewpoint is “representative universalism.” Some students of this passage believe that the writer was taking this view here. He was speaking in universal terms. He regarded the individual kings, towns, and areas that had been subdued as representative of the entire land of Canaan.[6]
This idiom appears elsewhere in the Old Testament. When Scripture says that “all the earth” came to Egypt to buy grain from Joseph (Gen 41:57), it does not mean every person on the globe. Similarly, “all Judea” and “all Jerusalem” going out to John the Baptist (Mark 1:5) or Solomon ruling “over all the kingdoms from the Euphrates River to the land of the Philistines and to the border of Egypt” (1 Ki 4:21) communicate general, not absolute, universality. Joshua’s use of this idiom expresses the theological truth that God had completely fulfilled what He promised to that generation. He had given them victory, possession, and rest. The remaining land would be conquered gradually, contingent upon Israel’s continued faith and obedience (Josh 23:5–13; cf. Judg 1:19, 27–36).
Therefore, the statements “the Lord gave Israel all the land” and “not one word has failed” (Josh 21:43–45; 23:14) should be understood as declarations of God’s proven covenant faithfulness within the historical framework of Joshua’s leadership. They do not mean that every geographical boundary of the Abrahamic Covenant was realized, but that God had done all He promised at that stage in redemptive history. Israel’s rest in the land (Josh 22:4; 23:1) was temporary and conditional, anticipating a greater rest that remains for the people of God (cf. Heb 4:8–9).
The Abrahamic Covenant itself remains unconditional and eternal, rooted in God’s sovereign promise and not dependent upon Israel’s obedience (Gen 12:1–3; 15:18–21; 17:7–8). Israel’s possession under Joshua was real but provisional. Their later disobedience brought discipline and dispersion, but not the cancellation of God’s covenantal oath. The full and everlasting fulfillment awaits the future Messianic Kingdom, when Israel will dwell securely in all the territory promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Gen 15:18; Isa 11:10–16; Ezek 47:13–23; Zech 14:9–11). Thus, Joshua’s record stands as a powerful testimony to divine faithfulness—God did everything He promised in that generation, and He will yet do all He has pledged in the ages to come.
Steven R. Cook, D.Min., M.Div.
If this article has enriched your understanding and walk with Christ, and you feel led to support my ministry, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Your gifts enable me to continue sharing the gospel of grace and providing in-depth biblical teachings. Thank you for partnering with me in this mission.
Related Articles:
- The Free Gift of God is Eternal Life
- God Loves Israel
- God’s Faithfulness to Israel
- Pray for Israel, God’s Chosen People
- Why and How I Pray for Israel
- The Faithfulness of the Lord
- A Brief Analysis of Israel in History and Prophesy
- Israel, Globalism, and the Rapture
- Faith from Beginning to End
- The Righteous Lifestyle of the Believer
- Walking Worthy of God’s Call to Service
[1] Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, Israelology: The Missing Link in Systematic Theology, Rev. ed. (Tustin, CA: Ariel Ministries, 1994), 632.
[2] John Phillips, Exploring the Minor Prophets (Kregel Publications; WORDsearch Corp., 2009), Ob 19–20.
[3] Norman L. Geisler, Systematic Theology, Volume Four: Church, Last Things (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House Publishers, 2005), 579.
[4] Donald K. Campbell, “Joshua,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary vol. 1 (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1985), 364.
[5] Ibid., 365.
[6] Tom Constable, Tom Constable’s Expository Notes on the Bible (Galaxie Software, 2003), Josh 21:43.